Largan Precision Co, LTD v. Motorola Mobility, LLC.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 14, 20244:21-cv-09138California793 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 LARGAN PRECISION CO, LTD, Case No. 21-cv-09138-JSW (DMR)

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING DISCOVERY

v. MOTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE

MOTOROLA MOBILITY LLC., Re: Dkt. No. 159 Defendant.

12 The parties filed a joint discovery letter in which Defendant Motorola Mobility LLC (“Motorola”) moves to compel Plaintiff Largan Precision Co., Ltd. (“Largan”) to produce its Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 30(b)(6) witnesses for deposition in or near San Francisco. The parties also dispute whether Motorola should be permitted to depose Largan’s CEO Adam Lin. Largan contends that Lin is subject to protection under the apex doctrine. [Docket No. 159.] With respect to the depositions of the Rule 30(b)(6) witnesses, it appears that the parties have not completed meeting and conferring on the number and scope of Motorola’s 30(b)(6) topics, and Largan contends that because of the outstanding disputes, it has not yet determined 20 who its 30(b)(6) designee(s)…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.