Vargas

Vargas v. Expedia, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 14, 20244:23-cv-06338California1,703 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 MANUEL VARGAS, Case No. 23-cv-06338-HSG

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’

v. MOTIONS TO DISMISS

EXPEDIA, INC., et al., Re: Dkt. Nos. 28, 33, 42 Defendants.

12 Before the Court are Plaintiff’s motion to strike Defendant Alaska Airlines’ answer, Dkt. No. 28, and Defendants Expedia, Inc.’s and United Airlines, Inc.’s motions to dismiss Plaintiff’s complaint, Dkt. Nos. 33 and 42. The Court finds these matters appropriate for disposition without oral argument and deems them submitted. See Civil L.R. 7-1(b). The Court GRANTS IN PART AND DENIES IN PART the motions to dismiss. The Court DISMISSES the federal claims with prejudice. The Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the remaining state law claims and DISMISSES them without prejudice to refiling in state court. The Court TERMINATES AS MOOT the motion to strike. I. BACKGROUND …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.