McLaughlin

McLaughlin v. Tesla, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 14, 20245:22-cv-07849California1,162 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 AARON MCLAUGHLIN, et al., Case No. 22-cv-07849-SVK

Plaintiffs,

ORDER GRANTING

v. MOTION TO SEAL

TESLA, INC., et al., Re: Dkt. No. 107 Defendants.

On September 5, 2024, the Parties appeared for a hearing on Defendant’s motions to exclude the testimony of two of Plaintiffs’ experts and to apply Virginia law to certain substantive issues in this action. See Dkts. 78-81, 98. The Parties subsequently requested a production of the transcript of the hearing, which the court reporter filed on October 8, 2024. See Dkts. 99-100, 106 (“Hr’g Tr.”). Defendant now moves to seal about four lines from the transcript in which counsel for Plaintiffs discusses crashes involving cars manufactured by Defendant and Defendant’s business practices regarding those crashes. See Dkt. 107 (the “Motion”). “Historically, courts have recognized a ‘general right to inspect and copy public records and documents, including judicial records and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.