Arnulfo Castaneda-Perez v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 15, 202421-70132California915 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 15 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ARNULFO CASTANEDA-PEREZ, No. 21-70132 Petitioner, Agency No. A213-086-321 v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General, Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted March 7, 2023 Submission Vacated April 13, 2023 Resubmitted November 15, 2024** Pasadena, California

Before: COLLINS and MENDOZA, Circuit Judges, and S. MURPHY, *** District Judge.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** This case was originally submitted to a panel consisting of Judges Watford, Collins, and S. Murphy. After Judge Watford resigned from the court, Judge Mendoza was drawn to replace him pursuant to General Order 3.2(h). Judge Mendoza has reviewed the briefs and the record. The reconstituted panel unanimously concludes that this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See FED. R. APP. P. 34(a)(2)(C). *** The Honorable…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.