Morales Urias v. Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 15, 202423-3433California664 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 15 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

HENRI MORALES URIAS; MARIA No. 23-3433 PINEDA-DE MORALES; YANIRA Agency Nos.

MORALES-PINEDA, A220-490-403

A220-490-404

Petitioners,

A220-490-405

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted November 5, 2024** Phoenix, Arizona

Before: HAWKINS, TASHIMA, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.

Henri Omar Morales Urias, his wife Maria Pineda-De Morales, and their

daughter Yanira Morales-Pineda, all natives and citizens of El Salvador, petition

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). for review from the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) decision dismissing

their appeal of an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.