Atilua-Diaz
Atilua-Diaz v. Garland
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 15, 202423-2481California1,054 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 15 2024
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
CARLOS ATILUA-DIAZ; DALIA No. 23-2481 ARDILA-PABON; MADDIE ATILUA- Agency Nos.
ARDILA, A240-818-640
A240-823-784
Petitioners,
A240-823-783
v.
MEMORANDUM*
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted November 6, 2024** Phoenix, Arizona
Before: PAEZ, BERZON, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.
Lead petitioner Carlos Atilua-Diaz, his partner Dalia Ardila-Pabon, and his
minor child, Maddie Atilua-Ardila, natives and citizens of Colombia, petition for
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) dismissal of their appeal of
the Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) denial of their applications…