People v. Duncan CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 15, 2024C100475California1,453 words

Opinion

Opinion

Mauro, J.

Filed 11/15/24 P. v. Duncan CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Butte) ----

THE PEOPLE, C100475

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. 23CF02158)

v.

WILLIAM EARL DUNCAN, JR.,

Defendant and Appellant.

Appointed counsel for defendant William Earl Duncan, Jr., asked this court to review the record and determine whether there are any arguable issues on appeal. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436.) Defendant was advised by counsel of the right to file a supplemental brief, and defendant filed a supplemental brief challenging the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress evidence.

1 Having reviewed the supplemental brief and the record, we conclude defendant’s challenge to the denial of his…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.