Kaur

Kaur v. Dual Arch International CA5

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 15, 2024F086272California7,272 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 11/15/24 Kaur v. Dual Arch International CA5

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

JASWINDER KAUR et al.,

F086272

Plaintiffs and Appellants, (Super. Ct. No. 20CV-03476) v.

DUAL ARCH INTERNATIONAL, INC. et al., OPINION Defendants and Respondents.

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Merced County. Brian McCabe, Judge. HBG Law and Harry B. Gill for Plaintiffs and Appellants. Fores Macko Johnston & Chartrand, Cory B. Chartrand and Megan D. Johnson for Defendant and Respondent, Dual Arch International, Inc. -ooOoo- This matter stems from a foreclosure sale that was successfully challenged and set aside by appellants Jaswinder Kaur (Kaur) and Parkash Pabla (Pabla) (collectively “Appellants”). On the first day of trial, the trial court…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.