Wells

Wells v. Sanofi S.A.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaSeptember 19, 20243:23-cv-02134California741 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RACHAEL WELLS, Case No.: 23-CV-2134 JLS (BLM)

Plaintiff,

ORDER CONTINUING STAY

v.

SANOFI S.A.; AVENTIS PHARMA S.A.; SANOFI US SERVICES INC. f/k/a

SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S. INC.; SANOFI-

AVENTIS U.S. LLC; HOSPIRA WORLDWIDE, LLC f/k/a HOSPIRA

WORLDWIDE, INC.; HOSPIRA, INC.;

PFIZER, INC., Defendants. 20 Presently before the Court is the Parties’ Joint Status Report (“JSR,” ECF No. 29). At the Parties’ request, the Court previously stayed this case for 90 days to allow the Parties to pursue a master settlement resolving this and other cases spun out of the multi-district litigation that spawned this case. ECF No. 25. At the expiration of the stay, the Parties requested an extension so they could finalize a Master Settlement Agreement memorializing the agreement in principle that they had reached. ECF No. 27 at 1–2. To that end, the Court continued the stay for 90 additional days and directed the Parties to file…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.