Chang

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 STACY CHANG, Case No. 22-cv-02010-AMO

Plaintiff,

ORDER RE MOTION FOR SUMMARY

v. JUDGMENT AND ALTERNATIVE

MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY

CARLOS CASHMAN, et al., JUDGMENT Defendants. Re: Dkt. No. 132

In this employment action arising out of an alleged failed joint investment venture, Plaintiff Stacy Chang sues Defendants Carlos Cashman, Arrowside Capital, LLC, Arrowside Fund GP, LLC, Arrowside Ventures, LLC, Cashman Family Investments II LLC, and Perseverus LLC1 (collectively, “Defendants”) for (1) fraudulent inducement, (2) negligent misrepresentation, (3) misrepresentations in violation of California Labor Code § 970, (4) breach of contract, (5) promissory estoppel, (6) unjust enrichment, (7) failure to pay wages upon separation of employment in violation of California Labor Code §§ 201, 202, and 2926, (8) violation of California Business and Professions Code § 17200 (the “UCL”), and (9) failure to…