Cupp

Cupp v. Plastiras

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 15, 20243:24-cv-03241California1,650 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 RONALD CUPP, Case No. 3:24-cv-03241-JSC

Plaintiff,

ORDER RE: MOTION TO DISMISS

v. 9 Re: Dkt. No. 30 BASIL PLASTIRAS, et al., Defendants.

12 Plaintiff Ronald Cupp sues Defendants Basil Plastiras, Michael Terrizzi, Plastiras & Terrizzi, APC, Parkway Properties 12 LLC. Plaintiff pleads claims under federal and state laws, including bankruptcy protections, consumer protection laws, slander of title, quiet title, cancellation of instruments, intentional infliction of emotional distress, and defamation. (Dkt. No. 1.) Defendants’ motion to dismiss is currently pending before the Court. (Dkt. No. 30.) After carefully considering the parties’ submissions and having had the benefit of oral argument on November 14, 2024, the Court GRANTS Defendants’ motion without prejudice to Plaintiff seeking relief in the bankruptcy court and in state court. BACKGROUND Plaintiff’s claims arise out of a monetary judgment Defendants obtained against…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.