Jasmine Torres v. SCIS Air Security Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaNovember 13, 20242:24-cv-07019California2,336 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

I. BACKGROUND

Plaintiff commenced this action in Los Angeles County Superior Court on July 17, 2024. (Complaint (Docket No. 1-3)). Plaintiff alleges that Defendant (1) failed to pay overtime wages under California Labor Code sections 510 and 1194; (2) failed to provide meal periods in accordance with Labor Code section 512, etc., and to pay one additional hour of pay for each workday that meal periods were not provided as required by Labor Code section 226.7; (3) failed to provide rest periods as required by applicable Wage Orders and to pay one additional hour of pay for each workday that rest periods were not provided as required by Labor Code section 226.7; (4) failed to pay minimum wages in violation of Labor Code sections 1194 and 1197; (5) failed to ______________________________________________________________________________

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES—GENERAL

Case No. CV 24-07019-MWF (BFMx) Date: November 13, 2024 Title: Jasmine Torres v. SCIS Air Security Corporation et al. pay timely wages in violation of Labor Code sections 201–03; (6) failed to provide accurate wage statements in violation of Labor Code section 226; (7) failed to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.