Fadayel

Fadayel v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 15, 20244:24-cv-03679California1,029 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 VICTOR FADAYEL, Case No. 24-cv-03679-HSG

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION TO

REMAND

v. Re: Dkt. No. 12 HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC., Defendant.

12 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff Victor Fadayel’s motion to remand, Dkt. No. 12. The Court finds this matter appropriate for disposition without oral argument and the matter is deemed submitted. See Civil L.R. 7-1(b). The Court DENIES the motion. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff initially brought this case in San Mateo County Superior Court against Defendant Home Depot U.S.A, Inc., and various unidentified Doe defendants. See Dkt. No. 1, Ex. A (“Compl.”) ¶ 6. The complaint describes the Doe defendants as both “agents or employees of the other named defendants” and “persons whose capacities are unknown to plaintiff.” See id. Plaintiff alleges that in March 2024 he was severely injured when heavy materials on a platform flatbed cart fell onto him while he was shopping at a Home Depot…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.