Campbell
Campbell v. San Diego Veterans Affairs
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CAMPBELL, et al., Case No.: 3:24-cv-01817-CAB-VET
Plaintiffs,
ORDER DENYING APPLICATION
v. FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN
FORMA PAUPERIS AND
SAN DIEGO VETERANS AFFAIRS, et
DISMISSING COMPLAINT
al., 15 Defendants. [ECF Nos. 1–2]
17 Plaintiffs John and Kathryn Campbell filed a complaint against various oncology 18 departments in San Diego, Sacramento, Redding, and Martinez that are allegedly 19 associated with the Department of Veterans Affairs, and unnamed medical center 20 employees. [See Complaint (“Compl.”) at 2.] At the time of filing, Plaintiffs did not 21 prepay the civil filing fees 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) requires. Instead, they filed a motion to 22 proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). [ECF No. 2.] For 23 the reasons discussed below, the Court DENIES Plaintiffs’ IFP motion and DISMISSES 24 Plaintiffs’ complaint with leave to amend.
I. Motion to Proceed IFP
26 Generally, all parties instituting a…