Hayday Farms, Inc. v. Feedx Holdings, Inc.

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 18, 202423-3182California562 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 18 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

HAYDAY FARMS, INC. and NIPPON No. 23-3182

KOKUSAI AGRICULTURAL HOLDINGS,

INC., D.C. No. 2:21-cv-00346-JGB-SP Appellants,

v. MEMORANDUM*

FEEDX HOLDINGS, INC.,

Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Jesus G. Bernal, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted November 6, 2024 Pasadena, California

Before: WARDLAW, HURWITZ, and DESAI, Circuit Judges.

Appellants, HayDay Farms, Inc. and Nippon Kokusai Agricultural Holdings,

Inc. (collectively, “HayDay”), appeal the district court’s amended judgment

concerning an arbitral award. We previously affirmed in part the district court’s 2021

order confirming the arbitral award, reversed in part the district court’s order

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. vacating the arbitral award, and remanded “with instructions to confirm the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.