Gil Cisneros v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 18, 202420-72700California680 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 18 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

GIL ANTONIO CISNEROS, Nos. 20-72700; 23-

Petitioner, Agency No. A038-793-911

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted November 5, 2024** Pasadena, California

Before: WARDLAW, HURWITZ, and DESAI, Circuit Judges.

Gil Cisneros, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions for review of two

decisions by the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”). The first denied his third

motion to reopen, and the second, although granting his motion to reconsider in part,

again denied the motion to reopen. Exercising jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252,

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). we dismiss the petition in part and deny it in part.

1.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.