Benitez-De Lopez v. Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 18, 202423-2023California622 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 18 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MARIA SUSANA BENITEZ-DE No. 23-2023 LOPEZ; ANDRES EZEQUIEL LOPEZ- Agency Nos.

BENITEZ, A220-687-096

A208-949-765

Petitioners,

v. MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted November 6, 2024** Pasadena, California

Before: W. FLETCHER and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges, and MÁRQUEZ, District Judge.

Maria Susana Benitez De Lopez (“Benitez De Lopez”) and her son, Andres

Ezequiel Lopez-Benitez, natives and citizens of El Salvador, petition for review of

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) decision dismissing their appeal from

an…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.