People v. Sandoval CA6

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 18, 2024H051298California1,743 words

Opinion

Opinion

I. INTRODUCTION

In 2014, defendant Ricardo Daniel Sandoval was sentenced to 18 years four months in prison for the instant case. In sentencing defendant, the trial court struck the punishment for a prior prison term enhancement (Pen. Code, § 667.5, former subd. (b))1 that arose out of defendant’s prior conviction for attempted robbery. In 2023, after the Legislature limited the circumstances in which a prior prison term enhancement may apply, defendant filed an application for resentencing under section 1172.75 regarding the now invalid prior prison term enhancement. The trial court denied defendant’s petition after concluding that the statute does not apply when the punishment for the enhancement has been stricken by the original sentencing court.

1 All further statutory references are to Penal Code unless otherwise indicated. On appeal, defendant contends that the trial court erred in determining that section 1172.75 does not apply if the punishment for the prior prison term enhancement has been stricken. For reasons that we will explain, we conclude that defendant is entitled to have his sentence recalled under section 1172.75. We will therefore reverse the trial court’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.