People v. Burroughs CA4/2

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 18, 2024E083535California742 words

Opinion

Opinion

BACKGROUND

In 1997 Burroughs pleaded guilty to voluntary manslaughter (§ 192, subd. (a)) and

robbery (§ 211). As part of his sentence, the court imposed a restitution fine of $3,200

under section 1202.4.

In 2024 Burroughs filed a motion on his own behalf seeking to vacate unpaid

restitution fines and fees under section 1465.9. The court denied his motion without a

hearing, holding he did not “identify any specific unpaid ‘Court imposed costs’ that have

been imposed on him,” and noting “[a]ctual restitution and restitution fine are not ‘Court

imposed costs.’ ”

ANALYSIS

On Burroughs’s request, we appointed counsel to represent him on appeal.

Counsel filed a brief declaring they found no arguably meritorious issues to appeal,

setting out a statement of the case, and asking us to conduct an independent review of the

record.

1 Unlabeled statutory citations refer to the Penal Code.

2 When appealing from a postconviction order a defendant has no constitutional

right to independent review under Anders/Wende.2 (Delgadillo, supra, 14 Cal.5th at

pp. 227, 231.) Nevertheless, the appellate court is to inform the defendant that they may

personally file a supplemental brief,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.