Giguiere

Securities and Exchange Commission v. Giguiere

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaNovember 18, 20243:18-cv-01530California5,589 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE Case No.: 18-cv-1530-WQH-JLB

COMMISSION,

ORDER

Plaintiff, 11 v.

GANNON GIGUIERE,

OLIVER-BARRET LINDSAY,

ANDREW HACKETT, KEVIN GILLESPIE, and ANNETTA

BUDHU,

16 Defendants. 17 HAYES, Judge: 18 The matters before the Court are the Motion for Summary Judgment as to Defendant 19 Andrew Hackett filed by Plaintiff the Securities and Exchange Commission (ECF No. 229) 20 and the crossclaims asserted by Defendant Andrew Hackett against Defendants Kevin 21 Gillespie and Annetta Budhu (ECF No. 144). 22

I. PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

On July 6, 2018, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) filed a Complaint 24 against Defendants Gannon Giguiere (“Giguiere”), Oliver-Barret Lindsay (“Lindsay”), 25 26 27 28 Andrew Hackett (“Hackett”), Kevin Gillespie (“Gillespie”), and Annetta Budhu (“Budhu”) (collectively, “Defendants”) alleging federal securities laws violations.1 (ECF No. 1.) On the same day, the United States Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of California (the “Government”) moved…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.