Floyd

Floyd v. 24 Hour Fitness USA, LLC.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 18, 20243:23-cv-00871California336 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 MICHAEL DEVIN FLOYD, Case No. 23-cv-00871-EMC

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

v. REQUEST FOR PROBATION

REFERRAL IN UNRELATED CASE

24 HOUR FITNESS USA, LLC, Defendant. Docket No.

12 13 Plaintiff Michael Floyd has filed suit against Defendant 24 Hour Fitness USA, LLC (“24HF”). He asserts various claims against 24HF related to its termination of his gym membership. Now pending before the Court is a motion from Mr. Floyd in which he notes that he is currently scheduled for a sentencing in Santa Clara Superior Court and in which he asks this Court to issue a letter stating that Mr. Floyd is litigating this suit as well as several other suits in the Northern District of California and recommending that probation be given in the state court case “as justice could not be served [in the federal cases] with an inexperienced pro se litigant in custody.” Mot. at 2. The motion for relief is DENIED. The federal…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.