J.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 J.T., et al., Case No. 23-cv-06524-LJC

Plaintiffs,

ORDER REGARDING LOCATION

v. DATA SOUGHT FROM FORMER

PLAINTIFF E.J.

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, et al., 11 Defendants.

12 The Court has considered the parties’ written and oral arguments and the two declarations of Defendants’ forensic vendor David Dang regarding extraction of geolocation data from former Plaintiff E.J.’s iPhone. Taking into account E.J.’s previous agreement to produce “any available location data for July 8, 2023, 4pm – 8:40pm,” the Court previously ordered the parties to meet and confer regarding production of E.J.’s location data, potentially including forensic review of his iPhone at Defendant’s expense. ECF No. 89 at 14. E.J. instead produced location data associated with several photographs and videos taken during that time, and the parties dispute whether that production was sufficient. E.J.’s location data has at least some relevance to the case,…