Carter

Carter v. Wells Fargo & Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 18, 20243:24-cv-07406California2,448 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 DARRYL CHADWICH CARTER, Case No. 24-cv-07406-DMR

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING IFP

v. APPLICATION AND SCREENING

COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C.

WELLS FARGO & COMPANY, et al., § 1915(E) Defendants.

On October 23, 2024, self-represented Plaintiff Darryl Chadwich Carter filed a complaint, an application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”), and a motion for service of process. [Docket Nos. 1 (Compl.), 2 (IFP), 4 (Mot. Service).] On November 3, 2024, Plaintiff filed a motion to amend the complaint with his first amended complaint (“FAC”) attached as an exhibit. 15 [Docket Nos. 9 (Mot. Amend), 9-2 (FAC).] A party may amend its pleading once as a matter of 16 course no later than 21 days after serving it. Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a). The court grants Plaintiff’s 17 motion to amend the complaint and treats the FAC as the operative complaint. The hearing on the 18 motion to amend set for December 12, 2024 is vacated. 19 Having considered Plaintiff’s papers,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.