Singh

Singh v. Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 19, 202423-1044California400 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 19 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SUKHWINDER SINGH, No. 23-1044 Agency No. Petitioner, A205-934-994 v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted November 4, 2024** Pasadena, California

Before: SCHROEDER, W. FLETCHER, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.

Sukhwinder Singh, a native and citizen of India, petitions for review of the

Board of Immigration Appeals’ (BIA) decision upholding the Immigration Judge’s

(IJ) denial of asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Against Torture (CAT). The claims were principally supported by the Petitioner’s

testimony, which the IJ discredited.

The record supports the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.