Cailean

Cailean v. O'Malley

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 19, 202424-596California876 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 19 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DANIELA CAILEAN, No. 24-596 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellant, 2:23-cv-00122-JAT v.

MEMORANDUM*

MARTIN J. O’MALLEY, Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona James A. Teilborg, Senior District Judge, Presiding

Submitted November 6, 2024** Phoenix, Arizona

Before: PAEZ, BERZON, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.

Daniela Cailean appeals from the district court’s judgment affirming the

Commissioner of Social Security’s denial of her application for disability

insurance benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act. “We review de novo

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). the district court’s order affirming the [administrative law judge’s (‘ALJ’s’)] denial

of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.