Volckaerts

EPAC Technologies, Inc. v. Volckaerts

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 19, 20243:24-cv-04148California301 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 EPAC TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Case No. 24-cv-04148-CRB

Plaintiff,

JUDGMENT

v.

JOHAN VOLCKAERTS, et al., Defendants.

On October 4, 2024, the Court granted Defendants’ motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction. See MTD Order (dkt. 42). The Court dismissed the claims against Defendants without prejudice, and when Plaintiff did not amend its complaint within 30 days, the Court ordered Plaintiff to show cause why the action should not be terminated. See OSC (dkt. 43). Plaintiff responded and requests two months to file an amended complaint while it pursues parallel litigation in the Netherlands. See OSC Response (dkt. 44) at 2. Plaintiff asserts that “further developments in the Netherlands actions may bear directly on the scope of this dispute.” Id. But Plaintiff does not explain how any developments would affect the Court’s jurisdictional ruling. See MTD Order at 5–7 (Plaintiff did not allege that Defendants targeted…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.