Morris

Morris v. Pfizer, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaNovember 19, 20243:24-cv-01988California1,710 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BRENDA MORRIS; and BRIANNE Case No. 24-cv-1988-BAS-BLM CHRISTINE EDLER, a minor, 12 Plaintiffs, ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE PLAINTIFF’S v. APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

PFIZER, INC.,

(ECF No. 2) Defendant. On October 24, 2024, Plaintiffs Brenda Morris and Brianne Christine Edler, a minor, proceeding pro se, commenced this action. (ECF No. 1.) The same day, Plaintiff Brenda Morris also filed an application seeking leave to proceed without prepaying fees or costs, also known as proceeding in forma pauperis (“IFP”). (ECF No. 2.) For the reasons discussed below, the Court DENIES WITHOUT PREJUDICE Plaintiff’s application to proceed IFP. Under 28 U.S.C. § 1915, an indigent litigant who is unable to pay the fees required to commence a legal action may petition a court to proceed without making such 25 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.