Matamoros-Palacios

Matamoros-Palacios v. Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 20, 202423-3389California999 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 20 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

KENGEL MATAMOROS- No. 23-3389 PALACIOS; LUCIANA MASSIELL Agency Nos.

MATAMOROS RUEDA; DIANA A220-509-031

GUADALUPE RUEDA LOPEZ, A220-509-032

A220-509-033

Petitioners,

v. MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted November 18, 2024** Seattle, Washington

Before: McKEOWN, GOULD, and LEE, Circuit Judges.

Kengel Jose Matamoros-Palacios, his wife Diana Guadalupe Rueda-Lopez,

and their child L.M.M.R., all natives and citizens of Nicaragua, seek review of the

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) order affirming…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.