Isabel Benitez v. Garland
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 20, 202423-1839California523 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 20 2024
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
YESENIA ISABEL No. 23-1839 BENITEZ; ALEJANDRO HIDALGO Agency Nos.
ISABEL; JOSE ALFREDO HIDALGO A215-816-120
ISABEL; MARLENE HIDALGO ISABEL, A215-816-121
A215-816-122
Petitioners,
A215-816-123
v.
MEMORANDUM*
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted November 18, 2024** San Jose, California
Before: GRABER, FRIEDLAND, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Petitioners Yesenia Isabel Benitez and her minor children,1 natives and
citizens of Mexico, petition for review of a decision by the Board of Immigration
Appeals (“BIA”) affirming an immigration judge’s (“IJ’s”) denial of…