Isabel Benitez v. Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 20, 202423-1839California523 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 20 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

YESENIA ISABEL No. 23-1839 BENITEZ; ALEJANDRO HIDALGO Agency Nos.

ISABEL; JOSE ALFREDO HIDALGO A215-816-120

ISABEL; MARLENE HIDALGO ISABEL, A215-816-121

A215-816-122

Petitioners,

A215-816-123

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted November 18, 2024** San Jose, California

Before: GRABER, FRIEDLAND, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Petitioners Yesenia Isabel Benitez and her minor children,1 natives and

citizens of Mexico, petition for review of a decision by the Board of Immigration

Appeals (“BIA”) affirming an immigration judge’s (“IJ’s”) denial of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.