In re Sessing CA2/6

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 20, 2024B335270California3,877 words

Opinion

Opinion

Baltodano, J.

Filed 11/20/24 In re Sessing CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION SIX

In re NATHAN GREGORY 2d Crim. No. B335270 SESSING (Super. Ct. No. 2005009634) (Ventura County) on Habeas Corpus.

In this petition for writ of habeas corpus, Nathan Gregory Sessing challenges the denial of his request for a second fitness hearing to determine whether a murder he committed in 2004 should be transferred from the jurisdiction of the juvenile court to adult criminal court. He contends he is entitled to a new hearing because the record does not clearly indicate that the juvenile court would have transferred his case had it applied the provisions of Assembly Bill No. 2361 (2021-2022 Reg. Sess.) (Assembly Bill 2361)…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.