Mann

Mann v. State of Cal.

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 20, 2024B328374California2,968 words

Opinion

Opinion

Chavez, J.

Filed 10/30/24; Certified for Publication 11/20/24 (order attached)

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO

ROBERT MANN, B328374

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. 20STCV21366) v.

STATE OF CALIFORNIA,

Defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Michael P. Linfield and Maurice A. Leiter, Judges. Reversed.

Rob Bonta, Attorney General, Jodi L. Cleesattle, Assistant Attorney General, Catherine Woodbridge and Donna M. Dean, Deputy Attorneys General, for Defendant and Appellant.

No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent. The State of California and the California Highway Patrol (CHP) appeal from a judgment granting injunctive relief requiring it to revise its vehicle impound procedures. CHP contends the injunction improperly requires it to contravene valid statutes, relies on inapplicable case law, conflicts with the existing statutory scheme, and mandates unnecessary revisions to its notice procedures. We agree and reverse.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

On June 5, 2020, Timothy Barker and Youth…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.