Corbi
People v. Corbi
Opinion
Opinion
Dato, J.
Filed 11/20/24 (unmodified opn. attached)
CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION*
COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION ONE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
THE PEOPLE, D081490
Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. SCD283353)
v. ORDER MODIFYING OPINION
AND DENYING REHEARING
FREDDY RIVERA CORBI,
NO CHANGE IN JUDGMENT
Defendant and Appellant.
THE COURT:
It is ordered that the opinion filed October 25, 2024 be modified at the paragraph commencing on the bottom of page 34 that begins with “In his reply brief” and ending at the top of page 35 with “by means of a habeas petition” to read as follows: Although his opening brief acknowledged the Lashon forfeiture rule and urged this court not to follow it, Corbi argues for the first time in his reply brief that if the RJA claim was forfeited, his trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance by failing to specifically raise it. “It is rarely appropriate,” however, “to resolve an ineffective assistance claim on direct appeal” and as a matter of fairness “we certainly will not do so where, as here, the claim is omitted
* Pursuant to…