Jayashankar
Kimera Labs Inc v. Jayashankar
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KIMERA LABS INC, Case No.: 21-cv-2137-MMA-DDL
Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND
v. DENYING IN PART MOTIONS TO
SEAL
EXOCEL BIO INC., RAJ
JAYASHANKAR, ALEJANDRO
[Dkt. Nos. 342, 346] (ALEX) CONTRERAS, and DEB
HUBERS, Defendants. 18 The parties move to file documents related to Defendants’ motion to compel (Dkt. No. 344) under seal. Dkt. Nos. 342, 346. Having considered the parties’ arguments and the applicable law, and for the reasons explained below, the Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART the motions. I. LEGAL STANDARDS The public enjoys “a general right to inspect and copy public records and documents, including judicial records and documents.” Nixon v. Warner Commc’ns, Inc., 435 U.S. 589, 597 (1978). This longstanding principle “is based on the need for federal…