Iedia Hess v. Heilind Electronics, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
JS-6
5 6 7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
12 Case No.: CV 23-07200-DMG (MARx) IEDIA HESS, Plaintiff, ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION
FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL
v. WITH PREJUDICE OF PAGA CLAIM
HEILIND ELECTRONICS, INC.,
Defendant.
19 The Court, having reviewed Plaintiff IEDIA HESS’s Supplemental Brief re 20 Stipulated Request To Approve FLSA & PAGA Settlement and Dismiss with 21 Prejudice [Doc. # 25], and having previously approved the settlement of all 22 individual claims in this action with the exception of Plaintiff’s PAGA claim, 23 ORDERS as follows: 24 1. PAGA requires the Court to review and approve the settlement of the PAGA claim. See Cal. Lab. Code § 2699(s)(2) (“The superior court shall review and approve any settlement of any civil action filed pursuant to this part. The proposed settlement shall be submitted to the agency at the
1 same time that it is submitted to the court.”); see also Smith v. H.F.D. No. 2…