Iedia Hess v. Heilind Electronics, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaNovember 20, 20242:23-cv-07200California882 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

JS-6

5 6 7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

12 Case No.: CV 23-07200-DMG (MARx) IEDIA HESS, Plaintiff, ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION

FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL

v. WITH PREJUDICE OF PAGA CLAIM

HEILIND ELECTRONICS, INC.,

Defendant.

19 The Court, having reviewed Plaintiff IEDIA HESS’s Supplemental Brief re 20 Stipulated Request To Approve FLSA & PAGA Settlement and Dismiss with 21 Prejudice [Doc. # 25], and having previously approved the settlement of all 22 individual claims in this action with the exception of Plaintiff’s PAGA claim, 23 ORDERS as follows: 24 1. PAGA requires the Court to review and approve the settlement of the PAGA claim. See Cal. Lab. Code § 2699(s)(2) (“The superior court shall review and approve any settlement of any civil action filed pursuant to this part. The proposed settlement shall be submitted to the agency at the

1 same time that it is submitted to the court.”); see also Smith v. H.F.D. No. 2…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.