Claudia Robles v. Festival Fun Parks, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaNovember 18, 20242:23-cv-09694California691 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

JS-6 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CLAUDIA ROBLES, Case No. 2:23-cv-09694-FLA (MARx)

Plaintiff,

ORDER REMANDING ACTION

v.

FESTIVAL FUN PARKS,

15 Defendant.

17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 On October 8, 2024, the court issued an order to show cause (“OSC”) why this action should not be remanded for lack of subject matter jurisdiction due to an insufficient amount in controversy. Dkt. 14. The court provided the parties fourteen days to respond and cautioned Defendant Festival Fun Parks, LLC d/b/a Raging Water Los Angeles (erroneously sued as Palace Entertainment Holdings LLC) (“Defendant”) that, as the party asserting federal jurisdiction, its “[f]ailure to respond timely and adequately to [the OSC] shall result in remand of the action without further notice.” Id. at 3. Federal courts are courts of “limited jurisdiction,” possessing only “power authorized by the Constitution and statute[.]” Kokkonen v. Guardian…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.