Ramos
Ramos v. Citibank, N.A.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DANIEL RAMOS, Case No.: 22cv2077-LL-VET
Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO
v. WITHDRAW AS COUNSEL
CITIBANK, N.A., ET AL., [ECF No. 35] Defendants.
17 Before the Court is Todd Friedman’s Motion to Withdraw as Counsel for Plaintiff 18 Daniel Ramos. ECF No. 35. Plaintiff’s current counsel, Todd Friedman, attests that he and 19 his client “have had a complete breakdown of the attorney-client relationship due to a lack 20 of communication and disagreements, and neither [him] nor [his] firm, can continue to 21 represent him.” ECF No. 35-2 ¶ 3. Mr. Friedman attests that Plaintiff Mr. Ramos was 22 notified of the firm’s intent to withdraw as his counsel since May 29, 2024, and that 23 Plaintiff has been advised to seek new counsel to represent him in this matter. Id. ¶ 4. This 24 matter is currently in arbitration proceedings under Arbitrator Kirk D. Yake. On June 5, 25 2024, Arbitrator Yake approved Plaintiff’s counsel motion to…