Haptic, Inc. v. Apple, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 20, 20243:24-cv-02296California2,160 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 HAPTIC, INC., Case No. 3:24-cv-02296-JSC

Plaintiff,

ORDER RE: DEFENDANT’S MOTION

v. TO STAY PENDING IPR

PROCEEDINGS

APPLE, INC., Re: Dkt. No. 114 Defendant.

12 Haptic alleges Apple infringes on four claims of its patent, U.S. Patent No. 9,996,738 (the “‘738 patent”). Apple now moves to stay these proceedings pending inter partes review (“IPR”). (Dkt. No. 114.) After carefully considering the parties’ pleadings, and having had the benefit of oral argument on November 14, 2024, the Court DENIES Apple’s motion to stay. BACKGROUND I. Complaint Allegations The asserted patent was invented by Swan Solutions, Inc. (Dkt. No. 1 ¶ 22.) Swan Solutions, Inc. changed its name to Haptic, Inc. and now Haptic is the “exclusive owner of all rights, title, and interest in the” asserted patent. (Dkt. No. 1 ¶¶ 22-23.) The technology provides coverage of a “tap-based control system that converts a surface…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.