Turley

Turley v. Laqunas

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaNovember 20, 20243:23-cv-00231California546 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MACEY E. TURELY, Jr., Case No.: 23cv0231-LL-BLM

CDCR #BF-8128,

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND

Plaintiff, RECOMMEDNATION [ECF No. 25] v. AND GRANTING DEFENDANT’S

MOTION FOR SUMMARY

LAQUNAS, ASU Floor Staff Correctional JUDGMENT [ECF No. 22] Officer, 16 Defendant.

18 Pending before the Court is Magistrate Judge Barbara L. Major’s Report and Recommendation (“R&R”), which recommends granting Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment. ECF Nos. 22, 25. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) set forth a district court’s duties in connection with a magistrate judge’s report and recommendation. The district court must “make a de novo determination of those portions of the report” to which “objection is made,” and “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge.” 28 U.S.C. §…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.