Robinson

Robinson v. Lee

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 20, 20243:24-cv-04228California2,082 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 DAVID ROBINSON, Case No. 24-cv-04228-TSH

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

v. DISMISS

KATHERINE S. LEE, Re: Dkt. No. 10 Defendant.

12 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff David Robinson brings this case against Defendant Katherine S. Lee based on architectural barriers he encountered at Loard’s Ice Cream in Oakland, California. He alleges violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”) and California’s Unruh Civil Rights Act. Defendant now moves the Court to decline supplemental jurisdiction over the Unruh Act claim and dismiss it pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1). ECF No. 10. Plaintiff filed an Opposition (ECF No. 13) and Defendant filed a Reply (ECF No. 14). The Court finds this matter suitable for disposition without oral argument and VACATES the November 21, 2024 hearing. See Civ. L.R. 7-1(b). For the reasons stated below, the Court GRANTS the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.