Jonathan Nguyen v. Coinbase Inc.

O

2 3 4 5 6

United States District Court Central District of California

11 JONATHAN NGUYEN, Case № 2:24-cv-02818-ODW (JPRx)

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT

v.

ONE FINANCE INC.’S MOTION TO

14 COINBASE INC. et al., DISMISS OR, IN THE Defendants. ALTERNATIVE, TO COMPEL

ARBITRATION [24]

16 17 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Jonathan Nguyen brings this action alleging violation of the Electronic 20 Funds Transfer Act (“EFTA”), 15 U.S.C. § 1693 et seq., against Defendants Coinbase 21 Inc. (“Coinbase”) and One Finance Inc. (“One Finance”). (Compl., ECF No. 1.) One 22 Finance moves to dismiss Nguyen’s claim against it pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil 23 Procedure (“Rule” or “Rules”) 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6). (Mot. Dismiss & Compel 24 (“Mot.” or “Motion”), ECF No. 24.) One Finance also moves, in the alternative, to 25 compel Nguyen to arbitrate his claim. (Id.) For the reasons discussed below, the 26 Court GRANTS One Finance’s Motion to dismiss Nguyen’s claim against it.1

28 1 Having carefully…