Ramirez

Ramirez v. Swift

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 20, 20243:24-cv-05974California536 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 ELIAS TORRES RAMIREZ, Case No. 24-cv-05974-SK

Plaintiff,

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE AND

v. VACATING CASE MANAGEMENT

CONFERENCE

TAYLOR ALISON SWIFT, et al., Defendants.

On August 26, 2024, Plaintiff Elias Torres Ramirez filed the instant case against Defendants Taylor Swift, Travis Michael Kelce, and “Theresa Tommasi and Val.” (Dkt. No. 1.) Plaintiff alleges that he and Swift are married but that Swift is not fulfilling their “Sacred Relationship” due to infringement by Kelce and others. (Id. at p. 3-4.) Plaintiff seeks “getting back together immediately,” control of Swift’s assets, and “certain individual’(s) be put to death.” (Id. at p. 8.) A trial court may dismiss a claim sua sponte under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim on which relief can be granted. Omar v. Sea-Land Serv., Inc., 813 F.2d 986, 991 (9th Cir. 1987). Such a dismissal may even be made without notice where the 20 plaintiff…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.