Joe Ledezma v. James Hill

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaNovember 19, 20242:24-cv-04888California2,234 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOE LEDEZMA, Case No. 2:24-cv-04888-HDV (MAA)

Petitioner, ORDER OF DISMISSAL v.

JAMES HILL,

Respondent.

16

I. SUMMARY OF PROCEEDINGS On May 28, 2024, a copy of a petition for writ of habeas corpus (“Petition”) regarding pro se Petitioner Joe Ledezma was mailed to a judge in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. (Pet., ECF No. 1.) That Court filed the Petition and on June 7, 2024, transferred the case to the United States District Court for the Central District of California. (ECF No. 5.) The Petition presented several problems. First, it appeared on a form used by the California State Courts rather than any form approved for use in any United States District Court. (Pet. 1-4, ECF No. 1.) In addition, the Petition was directed to, and captioned for, the “Court of Appeals of the State of California for the Second Appellate District - Division One.” (Id. at 1; see also id. at 5.) …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.