Roshan
Roshan v. Lawrence
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 PEYMAN ROSHAN, Case No. 21-cv-01235-JST
Plaintiff,
ORDER DENYING MOTION TO
v. ALTER JUDGMENT
MELANIE J. LAWRENCE, et al., Re: ECF No. 213 Defendants.
12 Before the Court is Plaintiff Peyman Roshan’s motion to alter or amend the Court’s June 17, 2024 judgment. ECF No. 213. The Court will deny the motion. Under Rule 59(e), a party may move a court to alter or amend a judgment within 28 days after entry of the judgment. Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e). “Since specific grounds for a motion to amend or alter are not listed in the rule, the district court enjoys considerable discretion in granting or denying the motion.” Allstate Ins. Co. v. Herron, 634 F.3d 1101, 1111 (9th Cir. 2011) (quoting McDowell v. Calderon, 197 F.3d 1253, 1255 n.1 (9th Cir. 1999) (en banc) (per curiam)). A Rule 59(e) motion “is an ‘extraordinary remedy, to be used sparingly in the interest of finality and conservation of judicial resources.’” Kaufmann v.…