Fisher

Fisher v. City of Berkeley

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 20, 20243:24-cv-08134California3,661 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 DIANE FISHER, et al., Case No. 24-cv-08134-CRB

Plaintiffs,

ORDER DENYING MOTION

v.

FOR A TEMPORARY

RESTRAINING ORDER

CITY OF BERKELEY, et al., Defendants.

Plaintiffs Diane Fisher, Mark Tayne, and Staci Prado are unhoused individuals with disabilities who live in Berkeley, California. They seek a temporary restraining order to prevent the City of Berkeley from displacing them from their encampments. For the following reasons, the Court DENIES their motion for emergency injunctive relief. I. BACKGROUND A. The Plaintiffs The Plaintiffs have all submitted declarations in support of their request for a temporary restraining order. Those declarations convey the following information: Plaintiff Mark Tayne grew up in Oakland, California, where he was unhoused for a period of time. Tayne Decl. (dkt. 6-2) at 1. He then moved to Berkeley, where he briefly stayed at the Dorothy Day shelter, but ultimately left because…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.