Rothenberg

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Rothenberg

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 20, 20244:23-cv-01606California1,901 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE Case No. 23-cv-01606-JST

CORPORATION,

8 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR ATTORNEY’S FEES v. Re: ECF No.

MICHAEL BRENT ROTHENBERG,

11 Defendant.

12 Before the Court is the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation’s (“FDIC”) motion for attorney’s fees. ECF No. 35. The Court will grant the motion. I. BACKGROUND This case arises out of loans that Silicon Valley Bank (“SVB”) made to Defendant Michael Rothenberg’s loans from Silicon Valley Bank (“SVB”). When Rothenberg failed to repay the loans, SVB filed a complaint against Rothenberg and his company, Rothenberg Ventures, LLC (“RVMC”), in Santa Clara Superior Court on February 13, 2019. Complaint, Silicon Valley Bank v. Rothenberg, No. 19-cv-343267 (Cal. Super. Ct. Feb. 13, 2019) (ECF No. 1-1 at 8–20). SVB originally alleged five causes of action––three breach of contract claims against Rothenberg based on his failure to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.