Roberts
Roberts v. Ford Motor Company
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DENISE ROBERTS, an individual, Case No.: 24-cv-1424-WQH-DDL
Plaintiff,
ORDER DENYING MOTION TO
v. REVIEW SETTLEMENT TERMS
FORD MOTOR COMPANY, and DOES
1 through 10, inclusive, [Dkt. No. 21] Defendants. 16 Before the Court is Plaintiff Denise Roberts’s “Motion to Review and Reconsider Settlement Agreement Due to Lack of Legal Representation and Signing Under Duress.” Dkt. No. 21. The Motion has been referred to the undersigned for decision. Dkt. No. 22. In her Motion, Plaintiff explains that she is “unsure if the settlement was fair and reasonable and is seeking the Court’s assistance in reviewing its terms to ensure they comply with the law.” Dkt. No. 21 at 2. For the reasons stated below, the Motion is DENIED. As a general rule, the Court does not review settlements of non-class claims where all settling parties are competent adults. Cf. CivLR 17.1 (requiring Court’s review and 25 …