Dario Pulcini v. Ford Motor Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaNovember 19, 20242:24-cv-08846California2,337 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

I. BACKGROUND

On July 24, 2024 Plaintiffs filed this action in California state court, alleging violations of California’s Song-Beverly Act arising out of their 2023 purchase of a 2022 Ford Edge (the “Subject Vehicle”). (See Ex. 1 to Mot., Compl., Doc. 9-3.) Plaintiffs allege that they are “individuals residing in the City of Los Angeles, State of California” and that the approximate value for the Subject Vehicle is $59,632.59.” (Id. ¶¶ 2, 8.) Plaintiffs seek “a civil penalty of up to two times the amount of actual damages.” (Id. ¶ 33.) Plaintiffs served the Complaint on Defendant on August 2, 2024. (Proof of Service, Doc. 9-4.)

______________________________________________________________________________

CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL

Case No. 2:24-cv-08846-JLS-AS Date: November 19, 2024 Title: Dario Pulcini et al v. Ford Motor Company et al

On August 23, 2024, Defendant served discovery on Plaintiffs. (Exs. C & D to Notice of Removal (“NOR”), Docs. 1-4, 1-5.) On October 4, 2024, Plaintiffs…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.