Christian Erickson v. Holcim US, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaNovember 18, 20242:24-cv-09239California1,637 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

1 JS-6 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CHRISTIAN ERICKSON, ) Case No. CV 24-9239 FMO (JCx) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ORDER REMANDING ACTION ) HOLCIM US, INC., et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ) 16 On May 9, 2024, Christian Erickson (“plaintiff”) filed a Complaint in the Los Angeles County Superior Court against Holcim US, Inc. (“Holcim”), Herbert Malarkey Roofing Company (“Malarkey”), and Jason Daily (“Daily”) (collectively, “defendants”) asserting state law claims relating to his employment. (See Dkt. 1, Notice of Removal (“NOR”) at ¶ 1); (Dkt. 6-1, Exh. A, Complaint at ¶¶ 34-83). On October 25, 2024, defendant removed that action on diversity jurisdiction grounds pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1332(a), 1441, and 1446. (See Dkt. 1, NOR at 1). Having reviewed the pleadings, the court hereby remands this action to state court for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. See 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c). …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.