Rosalety Avila Barnett v. Saint-Gobain Glass Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaNovember 18, 20248:24-cv-01844California10,747 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

I. Background

On July 19, 2024, Plaintiffs filed the Complaint in Orange County Superior Court, asserting individual and putative class claims for violations of the California Labor Code and California’s Unfair Competition Law (“UCL”), Cal. Bus. and Prof. Code § 17200, et seq. (See generally Dkt. 1, Exh. A (“Compl.”).) Plaintiffs assert eight wage-and-hour claims, generally alleging that Defendant failed to pay minimum, straight time, and overtime wages, provide meal and rest periods, pay timely wages at termination, provide accurate itemized wage statements, and indemnify employees for business expenditures. (Id. ¶¶ 32-95.) ____________________________________________________________________________

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL

Case No. 8:24-cv-01844-FWS-DFM Date: November 18, 2024 Title: Rosalety Avila Barrett et al. v. Saint-Gobain Glass Corporation et al.

On August 22, 2024, Defendant removed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1332, 1441, 1446, and 1453. (Dkt. 1.) Defendant alleged the court has jurisdiction over this suit under the Class Action Fairness Act of 2005 (“CAFA”), 28 U.S.C. §§ 1332(d) & 1453, because the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.