Pablo Ramirez-Benitez v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 21, 202420-73277California452 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 21 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

PABLO HAYDHAR RAMIREZ-BENITEZ, No. 20-73277

Petitioner, Agency No. A204-326-594

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted November 19, 2024** San Jose, California

Before: GRABER, FRIEDLAND, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges.

Petitioner Pablo Haydhar Ramirez-Benitez is a native and citizen of Mexico.

In the underlying proceeding, he conceded removability and applied for asylum,

withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture

(“CAT”). He seeks review of a final order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). (“BIA”) affirming an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) denial of all forms of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.